Impact of hypochloremia as a prognostic factor in patients with heart failure, a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: some studies suggest that hypochloremia is a risk factor in the prognosis of heart failure (HF) in patients with recent decompensation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: retrospective cohort study of patients discharged due to HF decompensation who began follow-up in a specialized clinic. Two groups are defined: patients with hypochloremia (chloride < 98 mmol/L) and normochloremic patients (chloride > 98 mmol/L) in the initial assessment within the first month after discharge. The rate of intravenous diuretic rescue, emergency department visits, readmission for HF and cardiovascular (CV) death are compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: 165 patients were included (59% women, mean age 85 years), with 60 (36%) having hypochloremia. Both groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics, except for female sex, presence of peripheral artery disease, moderate-to-severe liver disease (more prevalent in the hypochloremia group), PROFUND index, and baseline furosemide dose (higher in patients with hypochloremia). The incidence of the primary event was higher in subjects with hypochloremia than in normochloremic subjects (HR: 1.59, 95% CI 0.97-2.62), mainly due to the need for intravenous diuretic rescue (HR: 1.86, 95% CI 1.07-3.24). CONCLUSIONS: hypochloremia following admission for HF decompensation is associated with a greater need for intravenous diuretic rescue therapy and probably worse overall prognosis across the spectrum of the disease, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Validación externa del algoritmo InShape II para la exclusión de la enfermedad tromboembólica crónica en los pacientes con tromboembolismo pulmonar / External validation of the InShape II study algorithm for exclusion of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism

Antecedentes y objetivo La complicación a largo plazo más grave del embolismo pulmonar (EP) es la hipertensión pulmonar tromboembólica crónica (HPTEC), cuyo diagnóstico precoz implica la realización de un gran número pruebas. El estudio InShape II propone un algoritmo de cribado precoz que pretende disminuir el número de estudios ecocardiográficos. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es validar este algoritmo en nuestra cohorte de pacientes. Material y métodos Se analizaron retrospectivamente los pacientes ingresados con diagnóstico de EP por angio-TC, en el Hospital Rey Juan Carlos entre noviembre del 2017 y febrero del 2020, seguidos durante al menos un año. Se recogieron datos clínicos, analíticos, y pruebas complementarias a los 3 meses y al año. Se aplicó a estos pacientes el algoritmo del estudio InShape II para validar sus resultados. Resultados En el periodo de estudio fueron diagnosticados de EP 236 pacientes, de los cuales 137 fueron excluidos. Se validó el algoritmo en 99 pacientes. Aplicando el score del InShape II hubiéramos realizado 19 ecocardiogramas (3 de ellos con probabilidad intermedia/alta de HPTEC) y no se hubieran hecho en 80 (2 de ellos con probabilidad intermedia/alta), por lo que se estableció una sensibilidad del score de un 60%, con una especificidad de un 83%, y un área bajo la curva (AUC) de 0,715 (IC 95%: 0,472-0,958). Conclusiones Nuestros resultados apoyan que el algoritmo del estudio InShape II podría ser una herramienta útil en el cribado inicial del estudio de HPTEC en entornos de baja incidencia, ya que evitaría la realización de ecocardiogramas que no aportan valor (AU)

Background and aim The most severe long-term complication of pulmonary embolism (PE) is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and its early diagnosis often requires numerous diagnostic tests. The InShape II study proposes an early screening algorithm that aims to reduce the number of echocardiographic studies. The objective of our study is to validate this algorithm in our patient cohort. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to Hospital Rey Juan Carlos between November 2017 and February 2020, who were diagnosed with PE based on computed tomography angiography (CTA). Patients were followed for at least one year, and clinical, laboratory, and complementary test data were collected at three months and one year. The InShape II algorithm was applied to these patients to validate its results. Results During the study period, 236 patients were diagnosed with PE, of which 137 were excluded. The algorithm was validated in 99 patients. Applying the InShape II score, 19 echocardiograms would have been performed (three of them with intermediate-high probability of CTEPH), while 80 echocardiograms would have been avoided (two of them with intermediate-high probability). This yielded a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 83% for the score, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.715 (95% CI: 0.472-0.958). Conclusions Our results support the notion that the InShape II algorithm could be a useful tool for initial screening of CTEPH in low-incidence settings, as it would avoid unnecessary echocardiograms that do not provide additional value (AU)

External validation of the InShape II study algorithm for exclusion of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The most severe long-term complication of pulmonary embolism (PE) is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and its early diagnosis often requires numerous diagnostic tests. The InShape II study proposes an early screening algorithm that aims to reduce the number of echocardiographic studies. The objective of our study is to validate this algorithm in our patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to Hospital Rey Juan Carlos between November 2017 and February 2020, who were diagnosed with PE based on computed tomography angiography (CTA). Patients were followed for at least one year, and clinical, laboratory, and complementary test data were collected at three months and one year. The InShape II algorithm was applied to these patients to validate its results. RESULTS: During the study period, 236 patients were diagnosed with PE, of which 137 were excluded. The algorithm was validated in 99 patients. Applying the InShape II score, 19 echocardiograms would have been performed (three of them with intermediate-high probability of CTEPH), while 80 echocardiograms would have been avoided (two of them with intermediate-high probability). This yielded a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 83% for the score, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.715 (95% CI: 0.472-0.958). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the notion that the InShape II algorithm could be a useful tool for initial screening of CTEPH in low-incidence settings, as it would avoid unnecessary echocardiograms that do not provide additional value.

[Analysis of infectious diseases care in Spanish hospitals from 2016-2020, including the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic]. / Análisis de la atención a patologías infecciosas en los hospitales españoles en el periodo 2016-2020, incluyendo el primer año de pandemia por SARS-CoV-2.

Aims: This work aimed to review patients discharged from Spanish hospitals with a principal diagnosis of infection during a 5-year period, including the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Materials and method: This work analyzed the Basic Minimum Data Set (CMBD) of patients discharged during the 2016-2020 period from hospitals in the Spanish National Health Service in order to identify cases with a principal diagnosis of an infectious disease according to the ICD-10-S code. All patients older than 14 years of age admitted to a conventional ward or intensive care unit, excluding labor and delivery, were included in the analysis and were evaluated based on the discharging department. Results: Patients discharged with infectious diseases as the principal diagnosis have increased from 10% to 19% in recent years. A large part of the growth is due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Internal medicine departments cared for more than 50% of these patients, followed by pulmonology (9%) and surgery (5%). In 2020, 57% of patients with a principal diagnosis of infection were discharged by internists, who cared for 67% of patients with SARS CoV-2. Conclusions: At present, more than half of patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of infection are discharged from internal medicine departments. Given the growing complexity of infections, the authors advocate for an approach in which training allows for specialization, but within a generalist context, for the better management of these patients.

Análisis de la atención a patologías infecciosas en los hospitales españoles en el periodo 2016-2020, incluyendo el primer año de pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 / Analysis of infectious diseases care in Spanish hospitals from 2016–2020, including the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Objetivo Revisar los pacientes atendidos en los hospitales españoles dados de alta con un diagnóstico principal de infección en un periodo de 5 años, incluyendo el primer año de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Material y métodos Se han analizado los datos del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos (CMBD) de los pacientes dados de alta durante el periodo 2016-2020 de los hospitales del Sistema Nacional de Salud de España identificando aquellos que tuvieran un diagnóstico principal de enfermedad infecciosa según el código CIE-10-S. Se han incluido en el análisis todos los pacientes mayores de 14 años que hubieran ingresado en una planta convencional o de cuidados intensivos, excluyendo los partos, y se han evaluado las altas en función del servicio de alta. Resultados Los pacientes dados de alta con patología infecciosa han aumentado del 10% al 19% en los últimos años, y gran parte del crecimiento se debe a la epidemia por SARS-CoV-2. Los servicios de medicina interna atienden a más del 50% de estos pacientes, seguidos de neumología (9%) y cirugía general (5%). En el año 2020 el 57% de los pacientes con diagnóstico principal de infección fueron dados de alta por internistas, que atendieron al 67% de los pacientes con SARS-CoV-2. Conclusiones Actualmente más de la mitad de los pacientes que ingresan con diagnóstico principal de infección son dados de alta en medicina interna. Dada la complejidad creciente de las infecciones, abogamos por un abordaje en el que un área de capacitación permita una especialización, pero dentro de un contexto generalista, para el mejor manejo de estos pacientes (AU)

Aims This work aimed to review patients discharged from Spanish hospitals with a principal diagnosis of infection during a 5-year period, including the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Materials and method This work analyzed the Basic Minimum Data Set (CMBD) of patients discharged during the 2016-2020 period from hospitals in the Spanish National Health Service in order to identify cases with a principal diagnosis of an infectious disease according to the ICD-10-S code. All patients older than 14 years of age admitted to a conventional ward or intensive care unit, excluding labor and delivery, were included in the analysis and were evaluated based on the discharging department. Results Patients discharged with infectious diseases as the principal diagnosis have increased from 10% to 19% in recent years. A large part of the growth is due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Internal medicine departments cared for more than 50% of these patients, followed by pulmonology (9%) and surgery (5%). In 2020, 57% of patients with a principal diagnosis of infection were discharged by internists, who cared for 67% of patients with SARS CoV-2. Conclusions At present, more than half of patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of infection are discharged from internal medicine departments. Given the growing complexity of infections, the authors advocate for an approach in which training allows for specialization, but within a generalist context, for the better management of these patients (AU)

Analysis of infectious diseases care in Spanish hospitals from 2016 to 2020, including the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

AIMS: This work aimed to review patients discharged from Spanish hospitals with a principal diagnosis of infection during a 5-year period, including the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This work analyzed the Basic Minimum Data Set (CMBD) of patients discharged during the 2016⬜2020 period from hospitals in the Spanish National Health Service in order to identify cases with a principal diagnosis of an infectious disease according to the ICD-10-S code. All patients older than 14 years of age admitted to a conventional ward or intensive care unit, excluding labor and delivery, were included in the analysis and were evaluated based on the discharging department. RESULTS: Patients discharged with infectious diseases as the principal diagnosis have increased from 10% to 19% in recent years. A large part of the growth is due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Internal medicine departments cared for more than 50% of these patients, followed by pulmonology (9%) and surgery (5%). In 2020, 57% of patients with a principal diagnosis of infection were discharged by internists, who cared for 67% of patients with SARS CoV-2. CONCLUSIONS: At present, more than half of patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of infection are discharged from internal medicine departments. Given the growing complexity of infections, the authors advocate for an approach in which training allows for specialization, but within a generalist context, for the better management of these patients.

[What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later?] / ¿Qué sabemos del origen del COVID-19 tres años después?

More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country's first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincidence that the first cases of infection emerged in the city where the virology institute's headquarters is located, the failure to 100% identify the virus' RNA in any of the coronaviruses isolated in bats, and the lack of evidence on a possible intermediate animal host in the contagion's transmission make it so that at present, there are doubts about the real origin of SARS-CoV-2. This article will review two theories: SARS-CoV-2 as a virus of zoonotic origin or as a leak from the high-level biosafety laboratory in Wuhan.

¿Qué sabemos del origen del COVID-19 tres años después? / What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later?

More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country’s first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincidence that the first cases of infection emerged in the city where the virology institute’s headquarters is located, the failure to 100% identify the virus’ RNA in any of the coronaviruses isolated in bats, and the lack of evidence on a possible intermediate animal host in the contagion’s transmission make it so that at present, there are doubts about the real origin of SARS-CoV-2. This article will review two theories: SARS-CoV-2 as a virus of zoonotic origin or as a leak from the high-level biosafety laboratory in Wuhan (AU)

Han pasado más de tres años desde el primer caso de infección por un nuevo coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) en la ciudad de Wuhan (Hubei, China). En esta misma ciudad se fundó en 1956 el Instituto de Virología de Wuhan y en 2015 abrieron en este centro el primer laboratorio de bioseguridad de nivel 4 del país. La coincidencia de ciudad entre los primeros casos de infección y la sede del instituto de virología, sumados a la fallida identificación del RNA del virus al 100% en ninguno de los coronavirus aislados en murciélagos, junto con la falta de evidencia sobre el posible animal intermediario en la transmisión de contagio, hacen que a fecha de hoy surjan dudas sobre el origen real del SARS-CoV-2. En este artículo revisaremos dos teorías, el SARS-CoV-2 como origen zoonótico o como escape del laboratorio de alta bioseguridad en Wuhan (AU)

What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later?

More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country's first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincidence that the first cases of infection emerged in the city where the virology institute's headquarters is located, the failure to 100% identify the virus' RNA in any of the coronaviruses isolated in bats, and the lack of evidence on a possible intermediate animal host in the contagion's transmission make it so that at present, there are doubts about the real origin of SARS-CoV-2. This article will review two theories: SARS-CoV-2 as a virus of zoonotic origin or as a leak from the high-level biosafety laboratory in Wuhan.

Trombosis venosa de retina. Auditoría de un programa de atención especializada / Retinal vein occlusion. Audit of a specialized care program

Background and objectives Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most frequent cause of retinal vascular disease and is related to classic cardiovascular risk factors. A specific program was designed to detect and treat risk factors in patients with RVO. The aim of this study is to audit the results of this program. Patients and methods The program consisted of a multidisciplinary clinical evaluation by the Ophthalmology and Internal Medicine Departments. All patients with RVO were screened, at minimum, for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, overweight, and antiphospholipid syndrome. New risk factors or poor control of known risk factors were expected to be found in at least one-third of the patients. Among them, therapeutic measures were expected to be taken in at least two-thirds. A dissociated automated search of the data of all patients who entered the program between April 2021 and April 2022 was performed. Results Fifty-six patients were included for analysis. Of these, 39 (69.6%) had at least one new or poorly controlled risk factor and 43 (76.8%) had their treatment modified in some way. Antiphospholipid syndrome was detected in five (8.9%). Only one patient had low-risk hereditary thrombophilia. After an exhaustive examination, no risk factors were found in 11 patients. Conclusion This specific program has been effective in detecting new or poorly controlled risk factors and improving their treatment (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivo La trombosis venosa de retina (TVR) es la segunda causa más frecuente de enfermedad vascular de la retina y se relaciona con factores de riesgo cardiovascular clásicos. Se diseñó un programa específico para detección y tratamiento de factores de riesgo en pacientes con TVR. El objetivo de este estudio es auditar los resultados de dicho programa. Pacientes y métodos El programa consistió en una evaluación clínica multidisciplinar por parte de Oftalmología y Medicina Interna. A todos los pacientes con TVR se les realizó cribado, al menos, de hipertensión arterial, diabetes, dislipidemia, tabaquismo, sobrepeso y síndrome antifosfolípido. Se esperó encontrar nuevos factores de riesgo o pobre control de los ya conocidos en, al menos, un tercio de los pacientes. Entre ellos, se esperó tomar alguna medida terapéutica en, al menos, dos tercios. Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda automatizada disociada de los datos de todos los pacientes que entraron en el programa entre abril de 2021 y abril de 2022. Resultados Cincuenta y seis pacientes se incluyeron para el análisis. De ellos, 39 (69,6%) tenían al menos un factor de riesgo nuevo o mal controlado, y 43 (76,8%) vieron modificado en algún modo su tratamiento. Se detectó síndrome antifosfolípido en 5 (8,9%). Solo un paciente tenía una trombofilia hereditaria de bajo riesgo. Tras un examen exhaustivo no se encontró factor de riesgo alguno en 11 pacientes. Conclusión Este programa específico ha sido efectivo para detectar factores de riesgo nuevos o mal controlados y mejorar su tratamiento (AU)

Retinal vein occlusion. Audit of a specialized care program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most frequent cause of retinal vascular disease and is related to classic cardiovascular risk factors. A specific program was designed to detect and treat risk factors in patients with RVO. The aim of this study is to audit the results of this program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The program consisted of a multidisciplinary clinical evaluation by the Ophthalmology and Internal Medicine Departments. All patients with RVO were screened, at minimum, for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, overweight, and antiphospholipid syndrome. New risk factors or poor control of known risk factors were expected to be found in at least one-third of the patients. Among them, therapeutic measures were expected to be taken in at least two-thirds. A dissociated automated search of the data of all patients who entered the program between April 2021 and April 2022 was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included for analysis. Of these, 39 (69.6%) had at least one new or poorly controlled risk factor and 43 (76.8%) had their treatment modified in some way. Antiphospholipid syndrome was detected in five (8.9%). Only one patient had low-risk hereditary thrombophilia. After an exhaustive examination, no risk factors were found in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: This specific program has been effective in detecting new or poorly controlled risk factors and improving their treatment.

¿Has pensado alguna vez que ya no sirves como médico? / Have you ever thought that you are no longer fit to be a physician?

No disponible

Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. / Profilaxis de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa durante el embarazo.

The purpose of this guide is to suggest, based on the available clinical evidence, the prevention measures for venous thromboembolism during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum in expert recommendations and international guidelines. Venous thromboembolism is a cause of maternal death, and it is therefore important to consider those situations in which the risk is greater and for which women should undergo preventive treatment. Personal and family history, the presence of acquired or hereditary thrombophilia, patient-related factors and those related to pregnancy or childbirth have a relative weight that determines the start of treatment and its duration. Low-molecular-weight heparin is the treatment of choice for these women. Prophylaxis might be necessary during the antenatal or postnatal period, and the duration and indication will vary depending on the risks and benefits.

Utility of lateral flow tests in SARS-CoV-2 infection monitorization.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for medical and public health reasons, to allow the best treatment of cases and the best control of the pandemic. Serology testing allows for the detection of asymptomatic infections and 19-COVID cases once the virus has been cleared. We analyzed the usefulness of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid test of Autobio and tried to correlate its pattern with the severity of COVID19 infection. METHODS: We analyzed the accuracy and clinical usefulness of a point-of-care IgM and/or IgG test for SARS-CoV-2 in 35 COVID-19 patients [12 (34.3%) mild-moderate and 23 (65.7%) severe-critical] admitted to a field hospital in Madrid, as well as in 5 controls. RESULTS: The mean time from the first day of symptoms to the antibody test was 28 days (SD: 8.7), similar according to the severity of the disease. All patients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR+ showed the corresponding IgG positivity, while these results were negative in all control individuals. A total of 26 (74%) cases also presented with positive IgM, 19 (83%) were severe-critical cases and 7 (58%) were mild-moderate cases. The IgM response lasted longer in the severe critical cases (mean: 29.7 days; SD: 8.4) compared to the moderate cases (mean: 21.2 days; SD: 2.0).. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid serology tests are useful for the diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 (mainly IgG detection) and may also be correlated with the severity of the infection (based on IgM detection).

RECALMIN. Cuatro años de evolución de las Unidades de Medicina Interna del Sistema Nacional de Salud (2013-2016) / RECALMIN. Four years of growth of the internal medicine units of the Spanish National Health System (2013-2016)

Objetivos: Comparar la estructura, recursos y actividad de las Unidades de Medicina Interna (UMI) del Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS) en 2013 y 2016. Analizar las diferencias entre UMI en 2016 por tamaño de hospital. Material y métodos: Comparativa de 2 estudios descriptivos transversales de UMI en hospitales generales de agudos del Sistema Nacional de Salud con datos referidos a 2013 y a 2016. Las variables fueron recogidas mediante un cuestionario «ad hoc» (encuesta RECALMIN). Resultados: Entre 2013 y 2016 aumentó notablemente la demanda asistencial (con un promedio anual del 11% en altas de hospitalización y del 16% en primeras consultas) y ligeramente la comorbilidad (2%). En el mismo período, aumentó un 16,7% la productividad media de las UMI (0,6+0,3 vs. 0,7+0,3; p=0,09) y la estancia media disminuyó un 10% (9+2,2 vs. 8,1+2,1 días; p=0,001). Los progresos en la implantación de buenas prácticas y de una atención sistemática al paciente crónico complejo fueron escasos. La variabilidad entre UMI y las notables diferencias entre UMI de hospitales de tamaño distinto fueron hallazgos de ambas encuestas. Conclusiones: Las UMI respondieron al aumento de la carga asistencial que soportaron en el período 2013-2016 mejorando su eficiencia y productividad, pero los avances en la implantación de buenas prácticas, incluyendo la atención al paciente crónico complejo, fueron escasos. La importante variabilidad en los indicadores de estructura, actividad y modelos de gestión encontrada en 2013 se mantuvo en 2016

Objectives: To compare the structure, resources and activity of the internal medicine units (IMUs) of the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) in 2013 and 2016. To analyse the differences between IMUs in 2016 by hospital size. Material and methods: We conducted a comparison of 2 descriptive cross-sectional studies of IMUs in general acute care hospitals of the Spanish National Health System, with data referring to 2013 and 2016. The variables were collected via an ad hoc questionnaire (RECALMIN survey). Results: Between 2013 and 2016, the demand for care increased dramatically (with an annual average of 11% in hospital discharges and 16% in first consultations), and comorbidity slightly increased (2%). During this period, the mean productivity of IMUs increased 16.7% (0.6±0.3 vs. 0.7±0.3; P=.09), and the mean stay decreased 10% (9±2.2 vs. 8.1±2.1 days; P=.001). Progress in implementing good practices and systematic care for complex chronic patients was scarce. Both surveys found variability among IMUs and marked differences among IMUs of hospitals of different sizes. Conclusions: IMUs responded to the increased burden of care they supported during 2013-2016 by improving their efficiency and productivity; however, advances in implementing good practices, including care for chronic complex patients, were scare. The significant variability in the indicators of structure, activity and management models found in 2013 remained in 2016

Análisis de las hospitalizaciones por enfermedad cardiovascular en población diabética en España / Analysis of hospitalizations by cardiovascular disease in the population with diabetes in Spain

Objetivos: Diabetes mellitus se asocia con un marcado incremento de enfermedad cardiovascular. En el presente estudio analizamos la prevalencia de diabetes mellitus en pacientes hospitalizados en España en 2015 y la carga de enfermedad cardiovascular asociada. Métodos: Mediante el análisis del conjunto mínimo básico de datos (CMBD) del Ministerio de Sanidad del año 2015, se incluyen todos los pacientes dados de alta con diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus. Se describen las características epidemiológicas, la distribución por los diferentes servicios hospitalarios y la presencia de enfermedad cardiovascular. Resultados: En el año 2015 hubo 3.727.583 altas en España; de ellas, 619.188 correspondían a diabéticos (16,7%); el 56,8% eran varones y la edad media era de 73,2años. La prevalencia de enfermedad cardiovascular fue del 40,8%, distribuida en insuficiencia cardiaca congestiva (20,1%), enfermedad cerebrovascular (10,3%), enfermedad coronaria (9,4%) y enfermedad arterial periférica (9,1%). La mayor parte de pacientes ingresaron en los servicios de medicina interna (34,2%), cardiología (9,5%) y cirugía general (8,9%). La estancia media global fue de 8,2días y los reingresos a 30días alcanzaron el 14%. La mortalidad fue del 6,8%. Los pacientes ingresados en medicina interna tienen un grado de severidad más alto (3-4), 41,9% vs 31,6%, que los ingresados en otros servicios médicos (p<0,01) y que los ingresados en servicios quirúrgicos (11,2%) (p<0,01). Conclusiones: La diabetes mellitus es una comorbilidad importante de los pacientes ingresados en medicina interna. Una proporción significativa de estos pacientes presenta enfermedad cardiovascular, y la más frecuente es la insuficiencia cardíaca

Objective: Diabetes mellitus is associated with a marked increase in cardiovascular disease. In this study, we analysed the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in hospitalised patients in Spain in 2015 and the burden of associated cardiovascular disease. Methods: By analysing the 2015 minimum basic data set (MBDS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health, we included all patients discharged with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. We describe the epidemiological characteristics, distribution by the various hospital departments and the presence of cardiovascular disease. Results: In 2015, there was 3,727,583 hospital discharges in Spain, 619,188 of which involved patients with diabetes (16.7%), 56.8% of whom were men and with a mean age of 73.2years. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease was 40.8%, distributed among congestive heart failure (20.1%), cerebrovascular disease (10.3%), coronary artery disease (9.4%) and peripheral arterial disease (9.1%). Most of the patients were admitted to internal medicine (34.2%), cardiology (9.5%) and general surgery (8.9%) departments. The mean overall stay was 8.2days, the readmission rate at 30days was 14%, and the mortality rate was 6.8%. The patients hospitalized in internal medicine had higher severity levels (3-4) than those hospitalized in other medical departments (41.9% vs. 31.6%, respectively; P<.01) and those hospitalized in surgical departments (11.2%; P<.01). Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus is a significant comorbidity for patients hospitalized in internal medicine. A significant proportion of these patients present cardiovascular disease, mostly heart failure

RECALMIN. Four years of growth of the internal medicine units of the Spanish National Health System (2013-2016). / RECALMIN. Cuatro años de evolución de las Unidades de Medicina Interna del Sistema Nacional de Salud (2013-2016).

OBJECTIVES: To compare the structure, resources and activity of the internal medicine units (IMUs) of the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) in 2013 and 2016. To analyse the differences between IMUs in 2016 by hospital size. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a comparison of 2 descriptive cross-sectional studies of IMUs in general acute care hospitals of the Spanish National Health System, with data referring to 2013 and 2016. The variables were collected via an ad hoc questionnaire (RECALMIN survey). RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2016, the demand for care increased dramatically (with an annual average of 11% in hospital discharges and 16% in first consultations), and comorbidity slightly increased (2%). During this period, the mean productivity of IMUs increased 16.7% (0.6±0.3 vs. 0.7±0.3; P=.09), and the mean stay decreased 10% (9±2.2 vs. 8.1±2.1 days; P=.001). Progress in implementing good practices and systematic care for complex chronic patients was scarce. Both surveys found variability among IMUs and marked differences among IMUs of hospitals of different sizes. CONCLUSIONS: IMUs responded to the increased burden of care they supported during 2013-2016 by improving their efficiency and productivity; however, advances in implementing good practices, including care for chronic complex patients, were scare. The significant variability in the indicators of structure, activity and management models found in 2013 remained in 2016.

Analysis of hospitalizations by cardiovascular disease in the population with diabetes in Spain. / Análisis de las hospitalizaciones por enfermedad cardiovascular en población diabética en España.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes mellitus is associated with a marked increase in cardiovascular disease. In this study, we analysed the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in hospitalised patients in Spain in 2015 and the burden of associated cardiovascular disease. METHODS: By analysing the 2015 minimum basic data set (MBDS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health, we included all patients discharged with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. We describe the epidemiological characteristics, distribution by the various hospital departments and the presence of cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: In 2015, there was 3,727,583 hospital discharges in Spain, 619,188 of which involved patients with diabetes (16.7%), 56.8% of whom were men and with a mean age of 73.2years. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease was 40.8%, distributed among congestive heart failure (20.1%), cerebrovascular disease (10.3%), coronary artery disease (9.4%) and peripheral arterial disease (9.1%). Most of the patients were admitted to internal medicine (34.2%), cardiology (9.5%) and general surgery (8.9%) departments. The mean overall stay was 8.2days, the readmission rate at 30days was 14%, and the mortality rate was 6.8%. The patients hospitalized in internal medicine had higher severity levels (3-4) than those hospitalized in other medical departments (41.9% vs. 31.6%, respectively; P<.01) and those hospitalized in surgical departments (11.2%; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes mellitus is a significant comorbidity for patients hospitalized in internal medicine. A significant proportion of these patients present cardiovascular disease, mostly heart failure.

[Experience of a single-centre in the preparation of choosing wisely lists in Internal Medicine]. / Experiencia de un centro único en la preparación de listas choosing wisely en Medicina Interna.

OBJECTIVES: To identify areas for improvement, using a local list of interventions with low diagnostic and therapeutic usefulness for the 5 Related Diagnostic Groups, as well as the 5 main diagnoses most frequently seen in the hospital outpatient clinic. METHOD: A literature review method was used, supplemented with a Delphi process with 2 rounds. In the first round, participants in the selection process identified low-value interventions in relation to the most frequently observed diagnoses. In the second round, those interventions with lower usefulness were selected based on their frequency, cost, and risk to the patient. RESULTS: Out of a total of 100 recommendations made by 19 scientific societies, 23 received the highest number of votes in the first round. In the second round, 5 recommendations were selected for inpatients and 5 recommendations for outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: A simple method is described for developing a local guide to reduce the use of unnecessary medical interventions.